[ASLML] OBA CH

[Bruce Bakken]

> >
> >According to this bit in B2.1: " ... placing a shellhole counter ...
> >immediately after any Original KIA result ... ", we place the Shellhole 
>(and
> >thus remove the Trench) *immediately* after making the Original DR.
>
>Well, it's an argument, certainly, but I think that interpretation (remove 
>the
>terrain before resolving the attack) causes more problems than the 
>alternative
>I suggested (resolve the attack and then remove the terrain).
>

I have come to agree.

>I think the language of B2.1 is simply a bit sloppy.
>

Yes.

> >I don't like it, but it's hard to argue against that view.
>
>Not really; the argument is "that makes no sense".
>

Okay, but "reality" arguments are forbidden, I thought.  The same would go 
with "that makes no sense".  Historically on the ASLML, a response like that 
does not carry the day.

>Which is not to say that it's a *winning* argument, but I think I'll stick
>with it unless Perry advises otherwise.
>

Yes, clarification would be nice.  Just to tidy up the wording a little bit.

Regards,
Bruce Bakken

>----------------------------------------------------------------
>Bruce Probst              bprobst at netspace.net.au
>Melbourne, Australia      MSTie #72759
>"Omaha beach, June 5.  I was early."
>ASL FAQ              http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ
>

_________________________________________________________________
Check out MSN PC Safety & Security to help ensure your PC is protected and 
safe. http://specials.msn.com/msn/security.asp