[ASLML] Re: LitS Q
Chas Argent
sidirezegh at charter.net
Thu Mar 11 09:44:00 PST 2004
I don't think Stealth is going to matter much in a daytime Desert scenario; no Straying and no Ambush terrain...
-Chas
>
> From: scott.holst at us.army.mil
> Date: 2004/03/07 Sun AM 03:39:26 GMT
> To: Wynn <aslwynn at cogeco.ca>
> CC: ASLML <advanced-sl at multimanpublishing.com>
> Subject: Re: [ASLML] LitS Q
>
> Hi-
>
> Hopefully it was playtested with ANZAC troops in mind IE ANZAC's are stealthy......
>
>
> Scott "Used to Playtest" Holst
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wynn <aslwynn at cogeco.ca>
> Date: Friday, March 5, 2004 3:29 pm
> Subject: Re: [ASLML] LitS Q
>
> > Well, I know they were ANZAC but the scenario card doesn't say
> > they are so
> > defined. Only hint is the OB line for the 'British' side which
> > labels them
> > as 'elements of 2nd New Zealand Division'.
> >
> > So is a player supposed to just 'know' that they are ANZAC troops?
> > I see no
> > requirement anywhere as to how an OB or portion thereof is so
> > defined, so
> > COWTRA implies to me that therefore one should not play them as
> > ANZAC unless
> > they are so specified (clearly).
> >
> > What does the list say to this one? I am scheduled to play this one
> > tomorrow, so I'm hoping for a prompt answer!
> >
> > Wynn "Vale" Polnicky
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "N J Hickman" <nhickman at bigpond.net.au>
> > To: "ASLML" <advanced-sl at multimanpublishing.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:22 AM
> > Subject: RE: [ASLML] LitS Q
> >
> >
> > > Wynn wrote:
> > > > And, as a member of the Commonwealth like you, I should have
> > realizedthat
> > > > 'British' in MMPese doesn't necessarily mean British and
> > checked the OB.
> > > > The LitS SSRs refer ONLY to Brits, as does Rommel's Remedy SSR 3.
> > > >
> > > > Wynn "From a Dominion of the Empire" Polnicky
> > >
> > > I wonder how many ASLers have consequently played this scenario
> > without> realising that the "New Zealanders" are ANZACs (A25.44)?
> > I recall an AAR
> > > from an Australian at an American tourney who was told by his
> > opponentthat
> > > the troops in his scenario OB were "Australian, not ANZACs"! It
> > may be a
> > > small advantage, but an advantage nonetheless.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, I continue to wait patiently for J5 to arrive here in the
> > > Adelaide suburb of Wynn Vale ;-), so I can see for myself what
> > all the
> > > arguments are about...
> > > --
> > > N J Hickman / E-mail: nhickman at bigpond.net.au
> > > Adelaide SA / ASL FAQ:
> > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ> AUSTRALIA /
> > Airpower: http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/FW
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Aslml
mailing list