[ASLML] AOO Status

[Tate Rogers]

> 
> From: swfancher at mindspring.com
> Date: 2004/03/08 Mon PM 12:01:46 CST
> To: Tate Rogers <gr27134 at charter.net>, 
>         Seth W Fancher <swfancher at mindspring.com>, 
>         al cann <albcann at warwick.net>,  Keith Todd <ket74 at comcast.net>, 
>         "'ron mosher'" <rjmosher at pacbell.net>,  demoss at stanfordalumni.org, 
>         Aslml at asl-forums.net
> Subject: Re: Re: [ASLML] AOO Status
> 
> Gee Tate, if you can't think outside the box, why on earth should MMP?
> 
> Since you obviously missed it, I was not disagreeing with you.  The only thing I said was that what I thought was the biggest obstacle was getting the scenario distributed.  No where did I say it was insurmountable, and in fact
> I even suggested a way that they could do it relatively easily.
> 
> 
> But, I have to ask (tongue and cheek)...you said:
> 
> "BTW, if a guy buys the OWT HASL why should he have to get the Russians (i.e., buy BV) in order to play the Germans vs Brits."
> 
> If he's playing OWT with Germans and Brits then I am pretty sure he is going to have a problem.  That is 
> "Operation Watchtower" right?  That USMC vs HASL modiule?  Or were you intending to 
> suggest that you could play OWT using German and Brit counters if you didn't happen to have the actual 
> nationalities?

Sorry...meant Operation Veritable...

Later-

Tater