[ASLML] (fwd) Evan Sez Re: SP72 "One Tough Canuck"

[swfancher at mindspring.com]

Nope, not at all.  You would still get exactly the same response from me.  The company being discussed
was SP, not CH, not HoB, not MMP, nor any other company.  

Put it another way for you: your post suggests that SP is far superior to MMP.  But it's obvious from your post
that you think MMP sucks.  So, what your post says in effect is that SP is not like MMP, i.e., it doesn't suck.  Doesn't mean it's good either, just better than MMP.  So they could be mediocre, IYO.  but better than MMP.

Is that what you meant?  

Or did you mean to say that SP puts out high quality stuff?  If this is what you meant, then by refraining from 
bashing anyone the you would have made you point better.

As far as the "good old boys club," the only one I am guilty of belonging to is the one that weighs the merits
of each product mon its own merits and not on the basis of the label that comes on the packaging.  That's why I
actually still read your posts, because unlike some otehrs, I actually think that sometimes you have something
interesting to add.  Others do exactly what you do to MMP...put you in the kill file because they don't think you
have anything worth their time.  Different strokes.....

 



   

-----Original Message-----
From: scott.holst at us.army.mil
Sent: Mar 8, 2004 11:13 AM
To: vaslplayer at triad.rr.com
Cc: 'rwhelan' <garciagd at velocity.net>, 
	'Seth W Fancher' <swfancher at mindspring.com>, Aslml at asl-forums.net
Subject: Re: RE: [ASLML] (fwd) Evan Sez Re: SP72 "One Tough Canuck"

Hmmmm, so if I had put lets say CH! or HoB in place of MMP, I would be apart of the good ol' boys club huh? So bacically what you guys are saying is MMP can put out badly edited/ balanced products and they will still look good in your eyes. I bet if a star athlete did not own MMP, you guys would be slamming them too, ah well. 

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: David Reenstra <vaslplayer at triad.rr.com>
Date: Monday, March 8, 2004 9:56 am
Subject: RE: [ASLML] (fwd) Evan Sez Re: SP72 "One Tough Canuck"

> But use of the term "slamming" implies that Holst's comments on 
> MMP either a)
> have merit or b) someone else gives a rat's a$% when they read 
> them.  I've yet
> to see anything out of him that qualifies as either of the above.  
> Please choose
> from the following, more appropriate terms: "whining", "sniveling 
> remarks","pissing and moaning", "playground banter", "biased 
> bitching", "sour grapes",
> "envy of Curt's income level", etc.
> 
> Dave Reenstra
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >Hello!
> >
> >
> >> And I see you took the opportunity to turn a discussion
> >about a TPP into a
> >> chance to slam MMP.
> >
> >Just add him to your "blocked list" and be done with it:>)
> >
> >"The Army Guy's" slamming of MMP has been going on so long,
> >its just to the
> >point of being funny.  Its almost like Curt stole a girl
> >friend of "The Army
> >Guy" back in high school.
> >
> >
> 
> 
>