[ASLML] J74 - Priests On The Line

[Bruce Bakken]

Hello, Sam-Wise.

>
>I said:
>
> > >There is a Q&A from 1992 that states:
>
>And my buddy Bruce Bakken wrote:
>
> > Why use a Q&A that is 14 years old, when C8.2 clearly states that SS 
>have
> > their Depletion Numbers increased by one?
>
>Well, now that you mention it, I see that the text to which you are
>referring was added to the V2 rule book. The Q&A originated in V1 days, but
>the fact that the QUESTION WAS ASKED might, just might, indicate that there
>is still some need for the clarifying question / answer.
>

BUT... there was no criticism about the question in my reply...

AND... there would be no need for such clarification -- or question -- for 
those with 2nd Ed ASLRB...

AND ... wouldn't it be better to actually quote the rule that now exists 
(i.e. 2nd Ed ASLRB) rather than quoting a Q&A that might, just might, be 
obsolete?

Seems to me that a quote from 2nd Ed ASLRB would be more helpful to Original 
ASLRB owners than an old Q&A that may leave them to wonder whether it is now 
obsolete.

I know, I know... you're fond of your growing collection of Q&A...

;-)  :-)

(That last bit was a joke, Sam...)

Regards,
Buddy Boy
Bruce "actually impressed that Sam cares so much and works hard at 
maintaining the Q&A" Bakken

PS:  I STILL think that Q&A should be differentiated between Original ASLRB 
and 2nd Ed ASLRB.

_________________________________________________________________
Learn how to choose, serve, and enjoy wine at Wine @ MSN. 
http://wine.msn.com/