[ASLML] A control question

[Scott Jackson]

>Getting ready to play "First to Strike" from Streets of Fire. This is an
>older scenario, an looks dead even in ROAR. I have an opinion question...
>
>The VC state that the Germans must "solely control" a number of buildings 
>to
>win. This phrase appears in a few of the older scenarios - made before we
>all became so warped as to insist that all terms be defined in the index. 
>:)
>
>How do you interpret "solely control" with regard to a building?
>
>1. Building control (which would allow enemy units to be present in the
>building)
>
>2. Building control AND there can be no enemy units in the building
>
>3. Some other definition???
>
>
>My "gut" tells me that "sole" control implies that no enemy can be present
>in the building to win, but of course, this is not defined in the ASL 
>rules.
>My feeling is that if you interpret this as "building control" then you 
>make
>it too easy for the attacker.
>
>BTW, this phrase also appears in "To the Last Man" VC.


I agree with you, Sam.  I would consider using the interpretation that will 
best 'balance' the game, after considering player skill levels and it's ROAR 
balance.

Scott Jackson
aka Stonewall

_________________________________________________________________
Scope out the new MSN Plus Internet Software — optimizes dial-up to the max! 
   http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/plus&ST=1