[ASLML] A control question

Chuck T ctewks at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 20 14:54:54 PST 2004


the thing is...you can gain control of a building......and then have 
enemy units present in the building later and STILL control the 
building....which i thin is why the question is being asked....

looks like we need a perry sez to say "solely occupy" or "control building"

Chuck

Bruce Bakken wrote:
> Hi, Sam.
> 
>>
>> Getting ready to play "First to Strike" from Streets of Fire. This is an
>> older scenario, an looks dead even in ROAR. I have an opinion question...
>>
>> The VC state that the Germans must "solely control" a number of 
>> buildings to
>> win. This phrase appears in a few of the older scenarios - made before we
>> all became so warped as to insist that all terms be defined in the 
>> index. :)
>>
>> How do you interpret "solely control" with regard to a building?
>>
> 
> To me, this means Building Control, per A26.14.
> 
>> 1. Building control (which would allow enemy units to be present in the
>> building)
>>
> 
> Huh?  To control a Building, you must first have "an armed, Good Order 
> Infantry MMC at any non-rooftop, non-subterranean level of any hex of a 
> building... as long as the conditions of 26.11 are fulfilled." 
> (A26.14).  Per A26.11, "a side gains Control of a ... building by 
> occupying it with an armed Good Order Infantry MMC without the presence 
> of an armed enemy ground unit... in that same... building."  If an enemy 
> unit is present in the building, you do not control it.
> 
>> 2. Building control AND there can be no enemy units in the building
>>
> 
> If you control the building, by definition there can be no enemy units 
> in the building.  See above.
> 
>> 3. Some other definition???
>>
>>
>> My "gut" tells me that "sole" control implies that no enemy can be 
>> present
>> in the building to win, but of course, this is not defined in the ASL 
>> rules.
>> My feeling is that if you interpret this as "building control" then 
>> you make
>> it too easy for the attacker.
>>
> 
> It's not defined?  Yes it is: A26.14 referring to the conditions of 
> A26.11.  Makes sense to me...
> 
> I played this scenario a long time ago.  Really enjoyed it; lost as the 
> Germans.
> 
>> BTW, this phrase also appears in "To the Last Man" VC.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sam
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Find high-speed ‘net deals — comparison-shop your local providers here. 
> https://broadband.msn.com
> 
> 




More information about the Aslml mailing list