[ASLML] OAF2 Minefields

Mattias Rönnblom hofors at lysator.liu.se
Sat Feb 21 00:16:35 PST 2004


Bruce Probst <bprobst at netspace.net.au> writes:

> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:44:02 +0100, Mattias Rönnblom <hofors at lysator.liu.se>
> wrote:
>
>>in scenario OAF2, is the 16 Minefields factors AP or AT mines?
>
> I think it's reasonable to assume that they are A-P, as 16 A-T mines would
> be an extraordinarily high number (especially for a small scenario such as
> this).
>

Sounds reasonable. What's slightly confusing is that the "counter"
depiction suggests they are AT mines.

Regards,
        Mattias




More information about the Aslml mailing list