[ASLML] Minefield Clearance Question

[Ulric Schwela]

 --- Paul Kenny <homercles11 at hotmail.com> skrev:
> An MMC enters a hex containing a HIP 12 AP MF counter and a HIP 3 AT MF 
> counter.
> 
> He is attacked by but survives the AP MF attack.
> 
> Next turn he declares a clearance attempt and is successful, placing a 
> trailbreak counter.
> 
> Does this apply to both the AP and hte AT mines?  Does it apply to the AP 
> mines only? Does hte AT MF remain HIP but with a trailbreak?


I know! I know! I think...

Been clearing a few mines lately, so with RB, B24.74 and B28.48 handy, moi
tinking is this:
 - As in your example the chaps are already in the minefield, 'Known' status
is irrelevant (only used for placing partial-TB) and therefore the fact the
A-T are still HIP doesn't matter. B24.74 does not distinguish between mine
types, therefore with ol' COWTRA I say the mine clearance covers all.
Probably because having separate stacks of TB counters for AP and AT mines
would be a nightmare.

If the above is convoluted and not straight forward, it's because it's my 3rd
re-write which is the complete opposite of what I first thought, but I think
it's right.  ;)

Besides, if we go into reality arguments (tee hee)...


Let the 'ack 'ack begin Sir!


Cheers


=====
-- 
Ulric Schwela
Leigh, Lancashire, England
GSM +447753857878
Fax +447753939634
Currently playing:
 A16 - On The Borderline - Finnish - 4/12
 D8 - Gruppo Mobile - Italian - 3/5
 OVHS CG - 19 AM - Canadian - 4/9
 RB - CGIII - Soviet - 18-Oct - 4/8
 TOT37 - Breaching Maloarkhangelsk - German - 5/11.5

Höstrusk och grå moln - köp en resa till solen på Yahoo! Resor på adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html