[ASLML] Concealment question

[Bruce Probst]

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:24:33 -0500, "Brian W" <cardboard.killer at verizon.net>
wrote:

>If the timing is irrelevant, then there is no reason for the rules to
>differentiate between setting up one category (real units) and then
>another (OB granted '?').

I've already stated why I think the rules say that, but you just brushed
over that, apparently because it was inconvenient to your argument.

I see that Bruce B. makes the same point.

>I do not know what else to say about this. The rule may be ambiguous in
>ASLRBv2 because of the removal of the Q&A. It was not so in ASLRBv1,
>which both you and Bruce used to follow. Why do you think the rule was
>changed from v1 to v2?

Because the v1 Q&A was stupid (for reasons which I've previously outlined)?
I'm just guessing, but as an answer it certainly works for me.

>Since the rule has not changed, I will continue to play it as if the
>rule was meant to be played the same as in v1.

??  But it *has* changed, since the old Q&A prohibited > 1 dummy counters
under a real unit, and the new rules don't.  See -- I *told* you that you
were confused.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Probst              bprobst at netspace.net.au
Melbourne, Australia      MSTie #72759
"I like it VERY MUCH."
ASL FAQ              http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ