[ASLML] Concealment question

[Bruce Probst]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:07:40 -0500, "Brian W" <cardboard.killer at verizon.net>
wrote:

>>Yes, the rules do say that.  I say again: so?
>
>Strange that you have played this rule wrong so long for all these
>years.

*What* rule?  I may well have been playing rules wrong for years, but I
don't see that you could get that information from this particular
conversation.

If you mean, I've been putting dummies down before placing real units, well,
yeah, I do sometimes do that, and indeed I will continue to do so, *because
it doesn't matter*, as it seems I've mentioned three or four times already.
(And I see that others agree with me.)

>And you do not find it strange that you think the rule was
>changed in ASLBRv2 without any indication from MMP?

Ha, ha!  MMP changed *many* rules in 2nd edition without any indication,
because they botched up the change-tracking.  I've said as much many times
in the past.  So, no, I don't find that strange at all.

>You are generating free dummies by your illegal setup.

*What* illegal setup?  I can assure you that my setups are perfectly legal,
and I do not create dummies that I am not entitled to.  What I *don't* do is
obsess about when I put dummies down as opposed to when I put real units
down.  At the end of the day my counts are correct.

>Yes, they are.

Then why do read "single counter" and interpret it as "many counters"?
Personally, that seems to me like you're *very* confused.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Probst              bprobst at netspace.net.au
Melbourne, Australia      MSTie #72759
"I like it VERY MUCH."
ASL FAQ              http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ