[ASLML] J74 - Priests On The Line

[Bruce Bakken]

Tate,

>
>I was looking for some confirmation so I wouldn't waste several hours of
>game time playing it wrong. Sam provided what he had.
>

... which was identical to what the ASLRB says... so how could you have 
possibly learned anything based on the Q&A that was provided?

You were provided with no new insight, and got no other opinion about 
interpretation.

So what *did* you learn from Sam's reply???

>Not actually sure what your b*tch is here.
>

Think about what just happened:

You asked a question, which was answered with a Q&A that is very outdated 
vis-a-vis the 2nd Ed ASLRB...

You chastised me for raising the point, then patronized me by informing me 
what the ASLML "IS" for...

Finally you accept the matter as settled, when in fact you didn't learn a 
single thing from the Q&A and the Q&A did not clarify the rule *in any way* 
whatsoever.

So what could you have learned from the Q&A that you didn't already know?

This is not really a gripe.  I guess it just struck me as very odd, because 
you don't typically ask questions when a rule is so clear, and then accept 
an answer that says nothing different and is really no answer at all.  (At 
first, I was half expecting you to come back with your usually insightful 
"but look at this" commentary, but when it was not forthcoming I was 
surprised that you felt it necessary to ask the question in the first 
place...)

I recognize that my tone in this thread has been sarcastic, and there's no 
need for that, I suppose.  I apologize to both you and Sam about that...

Regards,
Bruce Bakken

_________________________________________________________________
Scope out the new MSN Plus Internet Software — optimizes dial-up to the max! 
   http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/plus&ST=1