[ASLML] DI Q

[Sam Belcher]

> Correct, but if (and I quote C3.6) "firing under adverse 
> conditions, it can become impossible to roll < or equal to 
> the required TH#. In this case (...), the firer still obtains 
> a hit with an Original 2 TH DR (Note no reference to CH. We 
> are talking about a 1,1 roll - not a CH) by making a 
> subsequent dr of 1, 2 or 3." So I still dont see any reason 
> why Improbable Hits cannot occur on a Deliberate 
> Immobilization attempt.

So, you are saying that a Deliberate Immobilization attempt can result in a
critical hit, but only if the TH modifiers are soooooo bad that a "2" (1,1)
is a miss? 

In addition to pointing out that this is absurd (reality argument, sorry)
I'd like to point out that Deliberate Immobilization is the "higher numbered
rule" (Critical hit is C3.7, Deliberat Immobilization is C5.72). It says (in
part) "A Deliberate Immobilization hit is not resolved on a To Kill Table -
even if it otherwise would be considered a CH..." 

So this statement takes precidence over C3.7 (higher numbered rule). A
deliberate immobilization hit is NOT RESOLVED on the to kill table EVEN IF
IT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A CRITICAL HIT. If you are correct, then please
explain to me what those words "really" mean. 

If you are correct, then under some circumstances a DI attempt can "become"
a critical hit. But the rule on DI clearly states that this can never
happen.

Thanks