[ASLML] Assault Engineers - 8-3-8's
Kenneally, Kevin
KKenneally at anteon.com
Mon Apr 12 11:08:35 PDT 2004
Sam,
See my answers inbedded within the message:
Subject: [ASLML] Assault Engineers - 8-3-8's
Hi,
>>Hi to you too....
The rule book, both V1 and V2, states that 8-3-8's are not automatically
considered Assault Engineers but need some designation to make them such.
>>I am in agreement here.
So two questions arise...
1. What is needed? Scenario B "Tractor Works" has a group of Germans that
the OB labels as "Company A, Assault Engineer Battalion 50". But there is no
SSR defining them as Assault Engineers. Are they? (I think yes.)
>>Yes, these are "Assault Engineers"... As far as I have played.
2. Is there ANYWHERE except H1.21 that states that "Assault Engineers" get
+2 to their smoke exponent?
>>NRBH, but believe H1.21 is the only source to use.
There are a LOT of rules in chapter H that apply only to DYO scenarios.
One could argue that the +2 smoke exponent is also only applicable to DYO where you "purchased" the units at extra cost to get the smoke, DCs and FT that come with them.
>> I am in agreement with the "one could argue comment". But still feel the 8-3-8 gets the "Assault Engineer" designation for that scenario and Scenario C as well. But then again, I have played these many-a-times, and have about a 50-50 won-loss record win either side. But sure do hate those flame throwers that ALWAYS break on the 1st DR.
Thanks.
Sam "I'm playing the side without the Assault Engineers - if that changes
your answer" Belcher
Sam, I believe you have a good cjance of "Smokin' 'em"....
Kevin"Just wish my FT's would work once in a while"
More information about the Aslml
mailing list