[ASLML] CC Infiltration: Perry hath spoken...

Beseler rln22 at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 3 11:08:39 PST 2004


>Thus, my three closely related questions: (1)  If, in a non-ambush 
>situation, the ATTACKER rolls an original 2, if he chooses to withdraw 
all 
>units, must he do so immediately, thus leaving the enemy unscathed? 
(2)  If 
>he elects to stay, in order to effect the usually lethal result, must 
he 
>suffer an attack from the eliminated DEFENDER, as per normally 
simultaneous 
>CC? (3) If the ATTACKER chose to \'resolve\' the original 2 as a CC 
attack, 
>has he lost the option of withdrawing (save a \'12\' rolled by the 
>DEFENDER)?
>


1)  No.
2)  Not if he Withdraws first.
3)  No.

....Perry
MMP


Two last comments: as Probst pointed out, an important way in which 
infiltration differs from an ambush attack is the 'NECESSITY' of 
withdrawal, for, if you don't, you get attacked!

Last but not least, as I believe Bakkan asked, in A18.12, the line
'Unless one or both sides Withdraw due to Infiltration'. How can
both sides withdraw due to infiltration? Just couldn't come up
with the die rolls that would make it possible. Sure you can somehow
though...

Yours,
Beseler




More information about the Aslml mailing list