[ASLML] A12.13 & C3.33 & C6.2 question

[Kenneth Knudsen]

Hi Andreas

The AFV have two options.

1. Use ITT.
He then have to add the Case K DRM. If its a hit, he will resolve it at full effect. If that results in at least a PTC, the target
loses its concealment and the AFV can gain acquisition. If he does not hit, or does not get a result, the target stays concealed and
no acquisition can be gained.

2. Use ATT
Same as above except that you only can get an Area Acquisition. And you get it even if its a miss or no result.

Also consider the TEM of the target as it will be applied on the To Hit in case 1 but not in case 2.

I think the general tactic is to use the ITT on close range and the ATT when farther away.

Cheers
Kenneth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elchjaeger" <ahinz at telia.com>
To: "ASLML" <Aslml at asl-forums.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: [ASLML] A12.13 & C3.33 & C6.2 question


> Hej Gents!
>
> I do have a question in regard to these three (and maybe more?) rules.
>
> Imagine a Pz IVH firing ATT at a concealed Russian squad 6 hexes away
> located in a wooden building. LOS hindrance exist in form of 1 grain hex (in
> season).
>
> The tank commander is CE and has the following options - please correct me
> if I am wrong, because I am not sure that the following is right.
>
> a)The tank commander chooses to fire ATT in order to gain acquisition on the
> concealed russian squad in the wooden building.
> The TH is 7 + 1 (grain, case R) + 2 (concealed, case K)
>
> If this is a hit - is the FP 7+2 (on IIFT) or 14+2 - before you answer check
> C3.33 & A12.13 & C6.2 (especially last sentence in C6.2)
>
> or
>
> b) Like case "a" but TH is 7 + 1 (grain, case R) + 2 (concealed, case K) + 2
> (ATT, case K)
>
> If this is a hit - what is the FP - or rules see above under case "a"?
>
> or
>
> c) The commander chooses ITT, do not get an acquisition but life becomes
> more easy.
>
>
> So how are the rules seen in the right way - any enlightment for me?
>
> Thanks in advantage for your answers and provided insights!
>
> Best Regards
>
> Andreas
>
>
>