[ASLML] Applying A7.52

[Ulric Schwela]

 --- "FLEURY, CHRISTOPHER J" <CHRISTOPHER.FLEURY at DFA.STATE.NY.US> skrev:
> Yes, it's possible for one FG unit to get TEM,
> and another unit to not get TEM - Wall, for 
> instance.
> 
> TEM:
> Unit A = +2 Wall
> Unit B = +0
> 
> Hindrance:
> Unit A = +0
> Unit B = +3 Smoke
> 
[snip]
> What they (including Perry) think is that it's
> +5, the worst possible "case" of *each* of TEM
> and Hindrance (and any other applicable DRM
> "case"), added cumulatively, suffered by any 
> given individual FG unit. The only thing they 
> *don't* accumulate is different "types" of
> Hindrance/TEM. Go figure, but they maintain
> that this isn't "inconsistent".
> 
> We accumulate squat; the rule doesn't say to do this,
> and despite A.5, we don't see an individual +1 CX as "detrimental" to an
> individual +1 Orchard.


Throughout this discussion, I find myself agreeing with camp "no"
[accumulation]. Just as well really, as Christopher and I are playing a CG!

To say that everybody being +1 CX, is less detrimental than everybody having
one of a variety of +1's like Encirclement, Hindrance, whatever, just seems
like a complete nonsense. +1 is +1 is +1. It's all the same.

Either just use a single unit's worst case, or accumulate everything
(including multiple cases of CX). I like consistency.

Just my tuppence worth. Cheers.


=====
-- 
Ulric Schwela
St. Helens, Lancashire, England
GSM +447753857878
Currently playing:
 A16 - On The Borderline - Finnish - 4/12
 D8 - Gruppo Mobile - Italian - 1/5
 OVHS CG - 19 AM - Canadian - 3/9
 RB - CGIII - Soviet - 18-Oct - 2/8
 TOT37 - Breaching Maloarkhangelsk - German - 3/11.5

Höstrusk och grå moln - köp en resa till solen på Yahoo! Resor på adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html