[ASLML] Re: The disappearing DRM caper

[Tate Rogers]

On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:22 PM, Bruce Probst 
[SMTP:bprobst at netspace.net.au] wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 09:16:13 -0500, "Tate Rogers" <gr27134 at charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>>The quote is righteous. What we have is a case of the writer being
> >unnecessarily verbose in his description.
>
> No, it's not unnecessary.  Final Fire is *all* fire that takes place in 
the
> Defensive Fire Phase, whether it's vs. an adjacent unit or not.  The
> addition of the "adjacent units" phrase in A7.353 serves to exclude all
> Final Fire that is *not* vs. adjacent units.

It is unnecessary because A7.353 is talking about a unit which has already 
used "First Fire" and thus is marked with a First Fire Counter. By rule, a 
unit marked with a First Fire Counter can use Final vs adjacent enemy units 
only. Thus, the reference to "adjacent" is not needed.

A7.353 is inconsequential for unmarked units using Final...they are only 
going to get one shot with their inherent anyway.

Later-

Tater (One Mean Spud!)