[ASLML] Re: The disappearing DRM caper

[Bruce Probst]

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:13:40 -0800, Jim McLeod <jmmcleod at mb.sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>Indeed I had.  But if each case is specific to itself as presented, then
>FPF can be used against which targets?

Against those targets for which it's legal to use FPF, Jim.  Is that not
obvious?

>Final Fire uses the same fire restrictions therefore

It most certainly does *not*.  A unit that has *already First Fired* suffers
such restrictions, but other units do not.  Don't you know the difference
between First Fire and Final Fire, Jim?

>A HS that DFF'd a MG and had no ROF could only FF at adjacent/same hex
>units anyway.  Why is FF versus adj. units option mentioned as such
>whilst FPF is not?

Because units that have not First Fired are *not* restricted to adjacent
targets, and the rule does not wish to include them in its discussion.

>BTW, you still have not informed when IFP is forfeit through SW useage. 
>Just when does that occur?

I get quite offended when someone blithely ignores what I have previously
stated and then claims that I never stated it.

Once again, Jim: it occurs on that attack.

Here's the breakdown in simple terms, Jim: A7.351 and A7.352 tell you what
the normal limits on firing IFP and SW are.  Both of them point to A7.353 as
the EXC for those limits.  A7.353 describes under exactly what conditions
those limits may be exceeded.

If you can't follow that logic, then the rest of the ASL rules must be a
complete mystery to you.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Probst              bprobst at netspace.net.au
Melbourne, Australia      MSTie #72759
"You can't handle the truth!"
ASL FAQ              http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mantis/ASLFAQ